
Agent Loop Budgets: Model Iterations, Cost, and Stopping Risk
A loop that usually finishes in three steps can still spend most of its money on the runs that don't.
Read tutorialLLM-driven systems that select actions or tools over one or more steps, including autonomy, state, budgets, and stopping behavior.
Tagged articles
20 articles in this tag.

A loop that usually finishes in three steps can still spend most of its money on the runs that don't.
Read tutorial
Here's the scene I've watched play out more times than I can count: someone builds their first agent, gives it a task, and watches it loop. It calls a…
Read tutorial
Two permission grants land on the review table. One lets the agent read every ticket and send email. The other lets it read assigned tickets and draft…
Read tutorial
The moment you give an agent a tool, you stop deciding what it does and start deciding what it is allowed to do. The real design question is not "can the…
Read tutorial
Your agent answered confidently. It was also wrong, and the memory record it trusted was three sessions old.
Read tutorial
The agent worked in the demo. Then you ran it on your own task, and it called a tool you never expected — or kept calling tools after the answer was…
Read tutorial
Your agent runs. It calls tools. It produces output. And yet, something is wrong—or it never stops running at all. The frustrating part is that you can't…
Read tutorial
You build an agent. You chat with it for a few turns. It helps you draft a plan, picks a tool, runs it, reports back. Then you ask: "What was the second…
Read tutorial
You have a task that needs an LLM. The temptation is to reach for an agent—something autonomous, something that "figures it out." But most of the time, a…
Read tutorial
A portfolio is not a trophy shelf. It is evidence of judgment — proof that you can pick a real problem, make the right tradeoffs, and ship something that…
Read tutorial
When builders hit a multi-path LLM application, many reach for an agent. That instinct costs them. The real mechanism for most of these systems is a…
Read tutorial
A team sets memory to refresh every six hours to save money. Four hours later, an agent quotes a price, policy, or preference that has already changed. The…
Read tutorial
Most teams pick agents or workflows by vibe. The demo looked smart, the diagram looked clean, and nobody wrote down what the choice would cost per run.…
Read tutorial
You can recite the four dispositions — continue, stop, retry, handoff — and still stare at a raw trace with no idea which one applies. That gap is the…
Read tutorial
The agent remembered everything and still gave the wrong answer. That is the failure this drill is built to prevent.
Read tutorial
A proposed tool call sits on your screen: send the summary to the client. You have a policy document open in another tab. Is this allowed, does it need…
Read tutorial
The run failed. The trace is four hundred lines long. Your instinct says the model is dumb — and that instinct is almost always the first thing to throw…
Read tutorial
You can explain RAG. You can sketch an agent loop. But when a real question lands on your desk, do you know whether to retrieve, route, or just answer?…
Read tutorial
Most beginners expect an agent to be a special kind of model—something with built-in magic that can browse the web, run code, and get things done. Then…
Read tutorial
An LLM agent is not a smarter chatbot. It is a goal-driven system that uses a language model as its brain, then loops through action and observation until…
Read tutorial